Is this in the progress? Option automate the complete process of giving clients their own account/access via pabbly/webhook
Trigger Form/Payment in Pabbly
-> Create User in ReTune (with Permission/Access Role)
-> Create Workspace(Bot) for User
-> Load Certain Prompt Template
Chris Tucker • 1 year ago
Did Retune just die? Sudden death???
Adam Gorecki • 1 year ago
Yes pls integrate as well webhooks, pabbly
Brendan O'Keefe • 2 years ago
Really hoping the ability to integrate via web hook, make, zapier and active pieces happens soon.
SaaS Re:Tune • 2 years ago
Pabbly would be better or at least Webhooks to sync lead capture info to other software.
Also let us use one whitelabel domain like app.domain.com to give clients/workspace user access to their chatbots.
Option automate the complete process of giving clients their own account/access via pabbly/webhook
Trigger Form/Payment in Pabbly
-> Create User in ReTune (with Permission/Access Role)
-> Create Workspace(Bot) for User
-> Load Certain Prompt Template
Done! ;)
Mauricio “Rockerfeler” Perera • 2 years ago
I don't understand why they don't just use the current API to make requests with a block of code, for example (it's practically copy and paste from the API section), instead of dedicating time and effort that could be applied to improving other aspects, such as enhancing the API's own features to perform more functionalities.
Emmad H. • 2 years ago
Any ETA on this?
rawson • 2 years ago
As there are many similar apps to Zapier, like 'Integrately' and 'Active Pieces', it might be a great idea to build out webhooks first, as all these apps will be able to link to re:tune then, before building out direct integrations with each of them. I, for one, would like to see an 'Active Pieces' integration.
Didier Lacroix • 2 years ago
Inbound and outbound webhooks will be awesome especially after expanding the number of documented APIs. Right now would love to get the api to retrieve captured leads variables. Appreciate any pointer
Didier Lacroix • 2 years ago
Inbound and outbound webhooks will be awesome especially after expanding the number of documented APIs. Right now would love to get the api to retrieve captured leads variables. Appreciate any pointer
Ben McGary • 2 years ago
Any update on this?
Acciom Limited • 2 years ago
Outbound Webhooks for the following would be awesome:
- Conversation started (inc. user IP, location, channel: e.g. Twilio, Telegram, Facebook, WhatsApp, etc)
- Conversation Responses
- Conversation ended
- Data captured
Inbound Webhooks to:
- Trigger a rescrape of a pdf, website, csv, google doc, etc
Marco Barral • 2 years ago
webhook!!!
Evandro Caruso • 2 years ago
Webhook please!!!
Mike Dhaene • 2 years ago
Make.com is so much better than Zapier or use a webook please
Joaco Solbes • 2 years ago
albato please, or webhooks for several use cases
WWizard AI • 2 years ago
Include Make.com as well if possible :)
Romeo Mann • 2 years ago
is this really in a week ? lets move it to the right place so we don't get unrealistic expectations. just saying.
Brendan O'Keefe • 2 years ago
Yes, agree a we book would be best.
Mario Adonis Saverin (Le Stratège) • 2 years ago
I don’t understand why Zapier and not Pabbly despite having more upvotes 🤔
Alessio Ferrente • 2 years ago
Pabbly too plz!
pat • 2 years ago
webhook please
Rob • 2 years ago
I am a Pabbly lifetime subscriber. Webhooks FTW!
Jeff G • 2 years ago
Who are you to say not Zapier but make? If you want make open a request elsewhere. This is for Zapier. Use your tiny brain and be respectful
Christophe HAMERLIK • 2 years ago
Agreed, webhook would be the way to integrate any automation tool !
Ryan Wood • 2 years ago
make.com is much better than Zapier, please use webhook
William O'Keefe • 2 years ago
Yes. Webhook so we can also use Make.com
dankassa • 2 years ago
Yes Webhook, not zapier or make module.
david • 2 years ago
i would not limit it to Zapier. Offer an open Webhook integrations would help in most cases.